Student-Initiated Research, Consequences, Peer Mentors, and Finding the Hope Inside for MilleniGenZ Students during the COVID-19 Years

Main Article Content

Sandra Emerson
Winny Dong
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-3892
Jeremy Aquino
Hosne Afrin

Abstract

The Office of Undergraduate Research (OUR) at Cal Poly Pomona explored factors contributing to student enrollment and engagement, especially for MilleniGenZ students. The research was built on the latest evidence that college students who engaged in research along with faculty mentoring and team collaboration were more able to persist in their studies than their peers who did not participate in similar activities. Most important for OUR was testing if participation was equitable by race, gender, and income categories in COVID-19 years (2020-2022) as compared with non-COVID-19 years (2016-2019). The study used quantitative analysis of the public record, qualitative review of student reflections, and open-ended interviews with peer mentors during the COVID-19 years of 2020 through 2022. As a result of our process, this is a convergent mixed methods design, which enabled the researchers to triangulate the findings and develop a deeper understanding of the research question: How well did diverse students navigate their college studies in uncertain circumstances?

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Ainsworth, P., & McKenzie, T. (2020). On the benefits of risk‐sharing for post‐COVID higher education in the United Kingdom. Economic Affairs (Harlow), 40(3), 446–453. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12433

Beltman, S., Helker, K., & Fischer, S. (2019). “I really enjoy it”: Emotional engagement of university peer mentors. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 11(2), 50–70.

Benham, G. (2021). Stress and sleep in college students prior to and during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Stress and Health, 37(3), 504–515. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smi.3016

BrckaLorenz, A., Garvey, J. C., Hurtado, S. S., & Latopolski, K. (2017). High-impact practices and student–faculty interactions for gender-variant students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(4), 350–365. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000065

Carragher J., & McGaughey J. (2016). The effectiveness of peer mentoring in promoting a positive transition to higher education for first-year undergraduate students: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 5(68), 1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0245-1

Casper, A. M. A., Rambo‐Hernandez, K. E., Park, S., & Atadero, R. A. (2022). The impact of emergency remote learning on students in engineering and computer science in the United States: An analysis of four universities. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(3), 703–728. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20473

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches, 4th edition. Sage Publishing.

Dennis, M. J. (2021). Pandemic magnifies pre‐COVID‐19 U.S. higher education challenges. Enrollment Management Report, 24(10), 3–3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emt.30729

Dong, W., Eddy, R. M., Mendelsohn, D. M., Koletar, C., Matelski, M., & Barraza, E. (2021). Effects of research-related activities on graduation at a Hispanic Serving Institution. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 0(0). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15210251211065099

Ehmke, M. D., Katare, B., Kiesel, K., Bergtold, J. S., Penn, J. M., & Boys, K. A. (2022). U.S. agricultural university students’ mental well‐being and resilience during the first wave of COVID‐19: Discordant expectations and experiences across genders. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 44(1), 129–161. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13233

Fechheimer, M., Webber, K., & Kleiber, P. B. (2011). How well do undergraduate research programs promote engagement and success of students? CBE life Sciences Education,10(2), 156–163. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-10-0130

Hardt, D., Nagler, M., & Rincke, J. (2022). Can peer mentoring improve online teaching effectiveness? An RCT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Labour Economics, 78, 102220–102220. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102220

Ipperciel, D. (2022). What should the future of learning look like? Looking back, looking forward. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(5), 51-69 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n5p51

Klinenberg, D., & Startz, R. (2023). Covid, colleges, and classes. Applied Economics, 55(5), 531–545. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2091110

Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. American Association of Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from: https://www.aacu.org/node/4084

Lopato, D. (2010). Undergraduate research as a high-impact student experience. PeerReview,12(2), 24–27.

Mohd, H. b. (2015). The Effects of group guidance peer mentoring module on grade performance of low academic achievement students in a higher education institution. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 6(2), 65–69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v6i2.191

Munsell, S. E., O’Malley, L., & Mackey, C. (2020). Coping with COVID. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 31(3), 101–109.

National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP). (2023). States’ COVID-19 public health emergency declarations. Portland, ME. Retrieved from: https://nashp.org/states-covid-19-public-health-emergency-declarations/ DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41271-020-00257-8

van der Pol, M. H. J., van de, Gurp, P. J. M. van Ede, A. E, van Terlouw, A., Hameleers, R. J. M., & Laan, R. F. J. (2022). Personal-professional Development Program Fosters Resilience During COVID-Pandemic. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205221098470

Power, R. K., Miles, B. B., Peruzzi, A., & Voerman, A. (2011). Building Bridges: A practical guide to developing and implementing a subject-specific peer-to-peer academic mentoring program for first-year higher education students. Asian Social Science, 7(11), 75-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n11p75

Rosendale, J. A. (2017). Gauging the value of MOOCs: An examination of American employers’ perceptions toward higher education change. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 7(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-09-2016-0065 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-09-2016-0065

Smith, C. W. (2000). Market Values in American Higher Education: The Pitfalls and Promises. Rowan & Littlefield.

State Council of Higher Education for Va.: COVID and Long-Term Trends Challenge Enrollment. (2021). Targeted News Service.

Whaples, R. M. (2022). The Future of Higher Education. The Independent Review 27(3), 325–333. Retrieved from: https://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?id=1778

Zarandi, A., Wen, A., & Rangachari, P. K. (2023). COVID struggles: Undergraduate Teaching Assistants balance teaching and learning during a pandemic. Advances in Physiology Education. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00164.2022