Main Article Content
This article explores how a disability justice framework would provide greater access to law school and therefore the legal profession for disabled students of color; specifically, disabled Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students. Using DisCrit principles formulated by Subini Annamma, David Connor, and Beth Ferri (2013), this article provides suggestions for incorporating a disability justice lens to legal education. In doing so, this article specifically recognizes the work of three disability justice activist-attorney-scholars, Lydia X.Z. Brown, Talila “TL” Lewis, and Katherine Pérez, and considers lessons from their advocacy and leadership that can apply in the law school setting.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JCSCORE (ISSN 2642-2387) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All content in JCSCORE is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Unless otherwise noted, works published in JCSCORE are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike License (CC BY-NC-SA). By granting a CC BY-NC-SA license in their work, authors retain copyright ownership of the work, but they give explicit permission for others to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy the work, as long as the original source and author(s) are properly cited (i.e. a complete bibliographic citation and link to the JCSCORE website), re-use of the work is not for commercial purposes, and the re-used work is shared with the same license. No permission is required from the author(s) or the publishers for such use. According to the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA license, any reuse or redistribution must indicate the original CC-BY-NC-SA license terms of the work.
Exceptions to the application of the CC BY-NC-SA license may be granted at the author(s)’ discretion if reasonable extenuating circumstances exist. Such exceptions must be granted in writing. For coordinating use permission you may either contact the author directly or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
American Bar Association (ABA). (2019a). ABA profile of the legal profession. ABA. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/images/news/2019/08/ProfileOfProfession-total-hi.pdf
American Bar Association (ABA). (2019b). Standards and rules for approval of law schools. §§ 314, 315. ABA. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/legal_education_and_admissions_to_the_bar/standards/2019-2020/2019-2020-aba-standards-chapter3.pdf
American Bar Association (ABA). (2019c). Various statistics on ABA approved law schools. ABA. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/resources/statistics/
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.
Annamma, S.A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Journal of Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1-31.
Annamma, S.A., Connor, D., & Ferri B. (2016). A truncated genealogy of DisCrit. In S.A. Annamma, D. Connor, & B. Ferri (Eds.), DisCrit: Disability studies and critical race theory in education (pp. 55-70). Teachers College Press.
Association of American Law Schools. (n.d.). FAQ. Association of American Law Schools: https://www.aals.org/prospective-law-students/faqs/
Berne, P. (2015, June 10). Disability justice—A working draft. Sins Invalid. https://www.sinsinvalid.org/blog/disability-justice-a-working-draft-by-patty-berne
Bibelhausen, J., Bender, K.M., & Barrett, R. (2015). Reducing the stigma: The deadly effect of untreated mental illness and new strategies for changing outcomes in law students. William Mitchell Law Review, 41(3), 918-947.
Brown, L.X.Z. (2018, April 23). The law won’t get us freedom, but disability justice makes us better lawyers, better advocates, and better humans [Blog post]. PSJD Blog. https://blog.psjd.org/2018/04/23/the-law-wont-get-us-freedom-but-disability-justice-makes-us-better-lawyers-better-advocates-and-better-humans/
Brown, L.X.Z., Ashkenazy, E., & Onaiwu, M.G. (Eds.). (2017). All the weight of our dreams: On living racialized autism. DragonBee Press.
Brown, L.X. Z., & the Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network. (2020a.). Contributors. Autism and Race: https://autismandrace.com/contributors/
Brown, L.X. Z., & the Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network. (2020b). All the weight of our dreams: on living racialized autism. Autism and Race. https://autismandrace.com/
Brown, L.X. Z., & the Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network. (2020c.). Autistic people of color fund. Autism and Race. https://autismandrace.com/autistic-people-of-color-fund/
Calarco, J.M. (2018). Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in schools. Oxford University Press.
Center for Democracy & Technology (n.d.). Lydia X.Z. Brown. https://cdt.org/staff/lydia-x-z-brown/
Chong, C.S.J. (2018). Battling biases: How can diverse students overcome test bias on the multistate bar examination. University of Maryland Law Journal on Race, Religion, Gender and Class, 18(1), 31-97.
Connor, D.J., Ferri, B.A, & Annamma, S.A. (Eds.). (2016). DisCrit: Disability studies and critical race theory in education. Teachers College Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Law Review, 140, 139-167.
Crenshaw, K.W. (2011). Twenty years of critical race theory: Looking back to move forward. Connecticut Law Review, 43(1), 1253-1352.
Crenshaw K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. The New Press.
Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Duhart, O. (2015). “It’s not for a grade”: The rewards and risks of low-risk assessment in the high-stakes law school classroom. Elon Law Review, 7, 491-526.
Foster, A.M. (2014). Reasonable accommodations on the bar exam: Leveling the playing field or providing an unfair advantage? Valparaiso University Law Review, 48, 661-693.
FourWheelWorkout aka 4WheelWomanist [@4WheelWorkOut]. (n.d.). Tweets [Twitter profile]. Retrieved December 2, 2019, from https://twitter.com/4WheelWorkOut
Grigely, J. (2017, June 27). The neglected demographic: Faculty members with disabilities. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Neglected-Demographic-/240439
HEARD. (n.d.). Board members & advisors. https://behearddc.org/about-us/board-members-advisors/
Hensel, W.F. (2008). The disability dilemma: A skeptical bench & bar. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 69, 637-656.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 34 C.F.R. Part 300.
Jaschik, S. (2019, March14). First victims of admissions scandal? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2019/03/14/advocates-students-learning-disabilities-fear-impact-admissions
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794, et seq.
Kanter, A.S. (2011). The law: What’s disability studies got to do with it or an introduction to disability legal studies. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 42, 403-479.
Lareau, A. (2011) Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Law School Admissions Council (LSAC). (n.d.). About the digital LSAT. LSAC https://www.lsac.org/lsat/taking-lsat/about-digital-lsat
Lewis, T.A. (n.d.). About me. https://www.talilalewis.com/about.html
Lewis, T.A. (2019a, March 5). Longmore lecture: Context, clarity & grounding. https://www.talilalewis.com/blog/longmore-lecture-context-clarity-grounding
Lewis, T.A. (2019b, August 27). Trump’s rule attacking disabled and low-income migrants has violent history. Truthout. https://truthout.org/articles/trumps-rule-attacking-disabled-and-low-income-migrants-has-violent-history/
Lewis, T.A. (2020, January 25). Ableism 2020: An updated definition. https://www.talilalewis.com/blog/ableism-2020-an-updated-definition
Liu, W.M., Pickett, T., & Ivey, A. (2007). White middle-class privilege: Social class bias and implications for training and practice. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 35, 194-206.
Loyola Law School. (n.d.-a.). Director, Katherine Pérez. https://www.lls.edu/coelhocenter/aboutus/director/
Loyola Law School. (n.d.-b.). Law fellows application information. https://www.lls.edu/coelhocenter/lawfellowsprogram/application/
Loyola Law School. (n.d.-c.). The Coelho Center Law Fellowship Program. https://www.lls.edu/coelhocenter/lawfellowsprogram/
Macfarlane, K. (2018, January 28). Making peace with testing accommodations. Ms. JD. https://ms-jd.org/blog/article/making-peace-with-testing-accommodations
Macfarlane, K. (2019, January 10). Testing accommodations are not a gift of extra time. Ms. JD. https://ms-jd.org/blog/article/testing-accommodations-are-not-a-gift-of-extra-time
Mercius, T.S. (n.d.). Four-wheel workout: Health and life in a wheelchair. https://fourwheelworkout.com/
Margiewicz, R. (2019, August 9.). The new role of the GRE in law school admissions. National Jurist. http://www.nationaljurist.com/prelaw/new-role-gre-law-school-admissions
National Conference of Bar Examiners. (n.d.-a). Character and Fitness Investigations. http://www.ncbex.org/character-and-fitness
National Conference of Bar Examiners. (n.d.-b). NCBE COVID-19 Updates. http://www.ncbex.org/ncbe-covid-19-updates/
National Conference of Bar Examiners. (n.d.-c). Uniform Bar Examination. http://www.ncbex.org/exams/ube
National LGBTQ Task Force. (n.d.). Staff bio: Victoria Rodriguez-Roldan, J.D. https://www.thetaskforce.org/staff-bio-victoria-rodriguez-roldan-jd/
Nyman Turkish PC. (2019, October 7). Statement on the amicable resolution of Binno v. LSAC. Cision. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/statement-on-the-amicable-resolution-of-binno-v-lsac-lawsuit-300931402.html
Organ, J.M., Jaffe, D.B., & Bender, K.M. (2016). Suffering in silence: The survey of law student well-being and the reluctance of law students to seek help for substance abuse and mental health concerns. Journal of Legal Education, 66, 116-155.
Pérez, K. (2019, February 2). A critical race and disability legal studies approach to immigration law and policy. UCLA Law Review. https://www.uclalawreview.org/a-critical-race-and-disability-legal-studies-approach-to-immigration-law-and-policy/
Rothstein, L. (2014). Forty years of disability policy in legal education and the legal profession: What has changed and what are the new issues? American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 22, 519-650
smith, s.e. (2019, March 27). Why the college admissions scandal threatens the disability community. Truthout. https://truthout.org/articles/why-the-college-admissions-scandal-threatens-the-disability-community/
Tushnet, M. (1991). Critical legal studies: A political history. Yale Law Journal, 100(5), 1515-1544.
U.S. Department of Education. (2019). Students with disabilities. National Center on Educational Statistics website: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=60
Wegner, J.W. (2018). Law school assessment in the context of accreditation: Critical questions, what we know and don’t know, and what we should do next. Journal of Legal Education, 67(2), 412-461.
Weis, L., Cipollone, K., & Jenkins, H. (2014). Class warfare: Class, race, and college admissions in top-tier secondary schools. University of Chicago Press.