Investigating the Academic Motivations of NCAA Gymnasts In and Out of Season

Authors

  • Amanda Paule-Koba Bowling Green State University
  • Maggie Dunn

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5267.2019.1.6.25-46

Abstract

As National Collegiate Athletic Association athlete exploitation has become a growing concern (Grasgreen, 2011), it has become increasingly more important to examine the nature of how athletes are spending their time. The purpose of this study was to examine whether motivations change when Division I athletes are in season compared to out of season. A survey was distributed to Division I women’s gymnastics teams from the Mid-American Conference (MAC). Results were assessed based on the factors of academic motivation and their differences during the varying times of the academic year.In this study, individuals from five MAC schools participated. It was concluded that, while academic motivations in season and out of season differed, there was not one season that was more academically demanding than the other. Participants reported feeling busier when in season, although being busy was not found to concretely impact their academics in negative ways. Participants were found to be motivated year-round by their own high expectations and wanting to decrease stress but were more motivated when in season to get ahead on academics to avoid having to focus on academics while traveling to away competitions.  

References

Anshel, M.H., Henry, R., & Kim, J.K. (2009). Reconceptualizing indicants of sport perfectionism as a function of gender. Journal of Sport Behavior, 32(4), 395-418.

Antonio Pineda-Espejel, H., Alarcón, E., Trejo, M., Chávez, C., & Arce, R. (2016). Personal factors associated with pre-competitive anxiety in elite gymnasts. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 8(3), 271-281.

Buning, M.M., & Thompson, M.A. (2015). Coaching behaviors and athlete motivation: Female softball athletes’ perspectives. Sport Science Review, 24(5), 345-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ssr-2015-0023

Comeaux, E. (2011). A study of attitudes toward college student-athletes: Implications for faculty-athletics engagement. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(4), 521-532.

Davies, B., Nambiar, N., Hemphill, C., Devietti, E., Massengale, A., & McCredie, P. (2015). Intrinsic motivation in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 86(8), 8-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2015.1075922

Gayles, J.G. (2009). The student athlete experience. New Directions for Institutional Research,144, 33-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.311

Gilman, R., & Ashby, J.S. (2006). Perfectionism. In G.G. Bear, & K.M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 303-312). Bethesda,MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

Grasgreen, A. (2011). Near-rebuke of NCAA reforms. Retrieved January 31, 2018, from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/11/02/panel-defends-athletes-says-ncaareforms-not-good-enough

Jang, B.G., Conradi, K., Mckenna, M.C., & Jones, J.S. (2015). Motivation. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 239-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1365

LSDBi. (2018). Retrieved March 16, 2018, from https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/search/proposalView?id=1765

NCAA. (2016). Results from the 2015 GOALS study of the student-athlete experience. Paper presented at the 2016 NCAA Convention, Indianapolis, IN. Retrieved from https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/GOALS_convention_slidebank_jan2016_public.pdf

NCAA. (2017). 2017-2018 NCAA Division I manual. Indianapolis, IN.

NCAA. (2019). Student athletes. Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.org/student-athletes

NCAA Academic Rankings. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.ncaagym.com/ncaa-academic-rankings/

Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Paule, A.L., & Gilson, T.A. (2010). Current collegiate experiences of big-time, non-revenue, NCAA athletes. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 3, 333-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.3.2.333

Paule, A.L., & Gilson, T.A. (2011). Does athletic participation benefit or hinder academic performance: Non-revenue sport athlete experiences. Journal of Contemporary Athletics, 5(3), 203-217.

Pedersen, D.M. (2002). Intrinsic-extrinsic factors in sport motivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 456-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.95.6.459-476

Provencio, C. (2016). Student-athlete: A study of student-athlete workload compared with traditional student workload. (Order No. 10157496, South Dakota State University).ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 65.

Saffici, C., & Pellegrino, R. (1998). Intercollegiate athletics vs. academics: The student athlete or the athlete-student. Journal of Sports, 19, 1-6.

Simons, H.D., Van Rheenen, D., & Covington, M.V. (1999). Academic motivation and the student athlete. Journal of College Student Development, 40(2), 151-161.

Vincent, W., & Weir, J. (2012). Statistics in kinesiology (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-18

How to Cite

Paule-Koba, A., & Dunn, M. (2020). Investigating the Academic Motivations of NCAA Gymnasts In and Out of Season. Journal of Higher Education Athletics & Innovation, 1(6), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5267.2019.1.6.25-46

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles