Practical Strategies for Thought Leaders in College Athletics and Higher Education: Developing a “Meaningful Education and Career Preparation as Compensation” Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5267.2016.1.1.61-72Keywords:
business of college sport, college athletics governanceAbstract
Recent discussion amongst scholars and practitioners related to current issues in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I college athletics has focused on areas such as the widespread commercialization of amateur sports, consistent corruption within athletics departments at NCAA member institutions, extensive exploitation of student-athletes and the necessity of a “pay for play” employee compensation model for student-athletes (see, for example, Benedict & Keteyian, 2014; Branch, 2011; Huma & Staurowsky, 2012; Nocera & Strauss, 2016; Southall & Staurowsky, 2013; Staurowsky, Maxcy, Karcher, Southall, Berri, & Otto, 2015). However, there has been minimal scholarly and industry discourse on how to leverage some of the revenues generated at the NCAA, conference and individual athletics program levels in order to develop innovative and sustainable higher education solutions that would prepare all student-athletes for career and personal success after participation in college athletics. The primary objective of this journal article is to encourage a more informed conversation about important issues in college athletics in part by proposing several practical strategies that would improve the overall student-athlete experience and further align participation in college athletics with the core goals of institutions of higher education.
This research note provides an overview of the college athletics business model at Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) institutions within Division I of the NCAA. In addition, this article reviews the current NCAA Division I governance structure. An accurate knowledge of the business and governance realities within college athletics is essential to understanding that paying student-athletes an hourly wage or annual salary is actually not one of the main system issues or central student-athlete wellbeing priorities of advocates for student-athletes, athletics leaders and higher education administrators. This article analyzes the primary issues and areas in which key college athletics stakeholders presently seek change and improvement. This article also spotlights innovative, culturally relevant student-athlete career and professional development programs recently developed by the University of Central Florida, Oregon State University and Vanderbilt University. Finally, this article provides a series of recommendations for all stakeholders involved in college athletics to optimize the student-athlete academic and athletic experience and to improve the level of career preparedness of all student-athletes.
References
Benedict, J. & Keteyian, A. (2014). The system: The glory and scandal of big-time college football. New York, NY: Random House LLC.
Branch, T. (2011). The cartel: Inside the rise and imminent fall of the NCAA. San Francisco, CA: Byliner Inc.
Brutlag Hosick (October 27, 2016). DI to distribute revenue based on academics: New model to allow schools with higher graduation rates, academic success to qualify for more funds. NCAA.org. Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.org
College Athletes Players Association. (n.d.). What we're doing. Retrieved from http://www.collegeathletespa.org/what
Ellis, Z. (August 18, 2016). Determined 'Dores: Operational excellence—Innovative program giving Vanderbilt student-athletes edge on future careers. VUCommodores.com. Retrieved from http://www.vucommodores.com/sports/zacellis/spec-rel/081816aag.html
Feldman, G. (2016). The NCAA and 'non-game related' student-athlete name, image and likeness restrictions [White paper]. Retrieved August 13, 2016 from http://www.knightcommission.org/images/pdfs/feldman_nil_white_paper_may_2016.pdf
Fields, S. K. (2012). Are we asking the right questions? A response to the academic reforms research the NCAA. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 5, 60-64. https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.5.1.60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.5.1.60
Harrison, C. K., & Bukstein, S. (2014). Canaries in the goal mines: A timely analysis of college athletics and the role of student-athletes. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 7, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2014-0133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2014-0133
Haslerig, S., & Navarro, K. (2016). Aligning athletes' career choices and graduate degree pathways: Implications for 21st-Century career development professionals. Journal of Career Development, 43(3), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845315597472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845315597472
Huma, R., & Staurowsky, E. J. (2012). The $6 billion heist: Robbing college athletes under the guise of amateurism. A report collaboratively produced by the National College Players Association and Drexel University Sport Management.
Internal Revenue Service (2014a). Form 990: Return of organization exempt from income tax: American Athletic Conference.
Internal Revenue Service (2014b). Form 990: Return of organization exempt from income tax: Big Ten Conference.
Internal Revenue Service (2014c). Form 990: Return of organization exempt from income tax: PAC-12 Conference.
Internal Revenue Service (2014d). Form 990: Return of organization exempt from income tax: Southeastern Conference.
Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics (2010). Restoring the balance: Dollars, values and the future of college sports. Miami, Florida.
Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. (2016). Knight Commission calls for NCAA to transform its guidelines for March Madness revenues to better support college athletes and protect financial integrity [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.knightcommission.org
National Collegiate Athletic Association (2014). NCAA Division I Steering Committee on Governance report to Division I Board. Indianapolis, Indiana.
National Collegiate Athletic Association (2015). NCAA Division I Board of Directors, Presidential Forum, Council and Committee on Academics priorities for 2015-16. Indianapolis, Indiana.
National Collegiate Athletic Association (2015). NCAA revenues and expenses: NCAA Division I intercollegiate athletics program report (2004-2014). Indianapolis, Indiana.
National Collegiate Athletic Association (2016). 2015-16 Division I revenue distribution plan. Indianapolis, Indiana.
National Collegiate Athletic Association (2016). NCAA Division I Strategic Summit Principles. Indianapolis, Indiana.
National Collegiate Athletic Association and Subsidiaries (2014). Consolidated financial statement as of and for the years ended August 31, 2014 and 2013. Indianapolis, Indiana.
National Collegiate Athletic Association and Subsidiaries (2015). Consolidated financial statement as of and for the years ended August 31, 2015 and 2014. Indianapolis, Indiana.
NCAA.com (2016). Turner, CBS and the NCAA reach long-term multimedia rights extension for the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship. NCAA.com. Indianapolis, Indiana.
Nocera, J. & Strauss, B. (2016). Indentured: The inside story of the rebellion against the NCAA. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.
Oregon State University. (2016). Everyday champions [Press release]. Retrieved from http://oregonstate_ftp.sidearmsports.com/sites/16everydaychampions.pdf
Osborne, B. (2014). The myth of the exploited student-athlete. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 7, 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2014-0136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2014-0136
PAC-12 Conference. (2014). Letter from PAC-12 presidents [Press release]. Retrieved from http://pac-12.com/article/2014/05/21/letter-pac-12-presidents
Smith, R. (1988). Sports and freedom: The rise of big-time college athletics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Southall, R., & Staurowsky, E. (2013). Cheering on the collegiate model: Creating, disseminating, and imbedding the NCAA's redefinition of amateurism. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 37(4), 403–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723513498606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723513498606
Staurowsky, E. J., Maxcy, J., Karcher, R., Southall, R., Berri, D., & Otto, K. (2015). College sport reform calls for a focus on college athletes' rights. College Athletes' Rights & Empowerment Faculty Coalition.
The Drake Group (2016). Position statement: Compensation of college athletes including revenues from commercial use of their names, likenesses, and images. University of New Haven.
