Confronting the Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Conviction: A Special Challenge for Social Work With Offenders
Main Article Content
Abstract
Millions of former offenders—often members of racial ethnic minority or other disenfranchised groups—experience restrictionson their legal and civil rights as the collateral consequences of their criminal conviction. It is critical for the social workers and other human service professionals who frequently interface with this population to understand these collateral consequences to effectively serve their clients with criminal convictions. This exploratory study examined the impact these collateral consequences may haveon social work practice with offenders. We assessed practitioners’ awareness, knowledge, and experiences with the collateral consequences of clients’ criminal convictions and practitioner efforts as‘‘agents of restoration’’ to pursue statutorily available court-ordered expungements of their clients’ criminal conviction records. Findings revealed that practitioners lacked awareness of collateral consequences, their application, and expungement. Recommendations to enhance social work practitioners’ ability to address andreduce the far-reaching collateral consequences of incurring acriminal conviction are discussed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of color blindness. New York, NY: New Press.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010).The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Anderson=Lexis Nexis.
Archer, D., & Williams, K. (2006). Making America the land of second chances: Restoring socioeconomic rights for ex-offenders. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 30, 527-584.
Barker, R., & Branson, D. (1993). Forensic social work: Legal aspects of professional practice. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
Beck, E., Kropf, N., & Leonard, P. (2010). Social work and restorative justice: Skills for dialogue, peacemaking, and reconciliation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195394641.001.0001
Benson, M. (1984). The fall from grace. Criminology, 22, 573-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00316.x
Benson, M., Alarid, L., Burton, V., Jr., & Cullen, F. T. (2011). Reintegration or stigmatization? Offenders' expectations of community reentry. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 385-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.05.004
Binnall, J. (2010). Sixteen million angry men: Reviving a dead doctrine to challeng ethe constitutionality of excluding felons from jury service. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 17 (1), 2-41.
Boraas, D. (2010). Expungement in Minnesota: Room for redemption. Legal Scholarship for Equal Justice Paper.
Brayford, J., Crowe, F., & Deering, J. (Eds.). (2010).What else works? Creative workwith offenders. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
Brisman, A. (2004). Double whammy: Collateral consequences of conviction and imprisonment for sustainable communities and the environment. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 28, 423-75.
Brown, D. (2011). Why Padilla doesn't matter (much). UCLA Law Review, 58,1393-1415.
Brownell, P., & Roberts, A. (2002). A century of social work in criminal justice and correctional settings.Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35, 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v35n02_01
Brustin, S. (2002). Legal services provision through multidisciplinary practice-encouraging holistical advocacy while protecting ethical interests. University of Colorado Law Review, 73, 787.
Burton, V., Jr., (1990). The consequences of official labels: A research note on rights lost by the mentally ill, mentally incompetent, and convicted felons.Community Mental Health Journal, 26, 267-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752777
Burton, V., Jr., Dunaway, G., & Kopache, R. (1993). To punish or rehabilitate? Are search note assessing the purposes of state correctional departments as defined by state legal codes.Journal of Crime and Justice, 16, 177-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.1993.9721485
Burton, V., Jr., Ju, X., Dunaway, G., & Wolfe, N. (1991). The correctional orientation of Bermuda prison guards: An assessment of attitudes toward punishment and rehabilitation. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 15, 71-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1991.9688955
Burton, V., Jr., Latessa, E., & Barker, T. (1992). The role of probation officers: An examination of statutory requirements. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 8, 273-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104398629200800401
Burton, V., Jr., Travis, L., & Cullen, F. T. (1987). The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A national study of state statutes. Federal Probation, 51, 52-60.
Burton, V., Jr., Travis, L., & Cullen, F. T. (1988). Reducing the legal consequences of a felony conviction: A national survey of state statutes. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 12, 100-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1988.9688883
Chin, G. J. (2007). Felon disenfranchisement and democracy in the late Jim Crow era. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 5, 329-340.
Christian, C. (2011). Collateral consequences: Role of the prosecutor. Howard Law Journal, 54, 749-752.
Clear, T. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305791.001.0001
Clopton, K., & East, K. (2008). Are there other kids like me? Children with a parent in prison. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 195-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0266-z
Codd, H. (2007). Prisoners' families and resettlement: A critical analysis. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 255-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00472.x
Comfort, M. (2007). Punishment beyond the legal offender. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 271-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112829
Conner, D., & Tewksbury, R. (2011). Ex-offenders and educational equal access: Doctoral programs in criminology and criminal justice. Critical Criminology, 11, 1-14.
Cox, R. (2010). Crime, incarceration and employment in light of the Great Recession. Review of Black Political Economy, 37, 283-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-010-9079-6
Cullen, F. T., & Gilbert, K. E. (2012). Reaffirming rehabilitation(2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315721361
Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2011). Rehabilitation and treatment programs. InJ. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime and public policy, (pp. 293-344). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cullen, F. T., Latessa, E., Burton, V., Jr., & Lombardo, L. (1993). The correctional orientation of prison wardens: Is the rehabilitative ideal supported? Criminology, 31, 69-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01122.x
Cullen, F. T., Skovron, S., Scott, J., & Burton, V., Jr. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of the rehabilitative ideal. Criminal Justice and Behavior,17, 6-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001003
Dallaire, D., & Wilson, L. (2010). The relation of exposure to parental criminal activity, arrest and sentencing to children's maladjustment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 404-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9311-9
Davis, L. (2009). An amicus perspective on recent Minnesota criminal expungement. William Mitchell Journal of Law and Practice, 2, 4.
Ewald, A. C. (2012). Collateral consequences in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 93, 211-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00831.x
Finzen, M. (2005). Systems of oppression: The collateral consequences of incarceration and their effects on black communities. Georgetown Journal of Poverty Law and Policy, 12, 229-324.
Fox, K. (2010). Second chances: A comparison of civic engagement in offender reentry programs. Criminal Justice Review, 35, 335-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016809360328
Freudenburg, N., Daniels, J., Crum, M., Perkins, T., & Richie, B. (2005). Coming home from jail: The social and health consequences of community reentry for women, male adolescents, and their families and communities. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1725-1736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.056325
Galaway, B. (1988). Crime victim and offender mediation as a social work strategy. Social Service Review, 62, 668-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/644581
Galowitz, P. (1999). Collaboration between lawyers and social workers: Reexamining the nature and potential of the relationship. Fordham Law Review, 67, 2123-2154.
Gunnison, E., & Helfgott, J. (2011). Factors that hinder offender reentry success: A view from community corrections officers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 287-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09360661
Hartley, C., & Petrucci, C. (2004). Practicing culturally competent therapeutic jurisprudence: A collaboration between social work and law. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 14, 133-182.
Hemmens, C., Miller, M., Burton, V., Jr., & Milner, S. (2002). The consequences of official labels: An examination of rights lost by the mentally ill and mentally incompetent ten years later.Community Mental Health Journal, 38, 129-140.
Henry, J., & Jacobs, J. (2007). Ban the box to promote ex-offender employment.Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 755-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00470.x
Jacobs, J. (2006). Mass incarceration and the proliferation of criminal records. St.Thomas Law Journal, 3, 387-420.
Jacobs, J. (2012). Are criminal convictions a public Matter? The USA and Spain. Punishment and Society, 14, 3-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474511424677
Joy, P., & McMunigal, K. (2010). ABA explains prosecutor's ethical disclosure duty.American Bar Association Criminal Justice, 24 (4), 41-45.
Larkin, J. (2011). A proposed framework for evaluating effectiveness of counsel under Padilla v. Kentucky. American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 34, 565.
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2002). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leopper, R. (2006). Integrating health care into the one-stop System for workforce development as a safety net for ex-offenders. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.084004
Levenson, J. (2008). Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society, 21,153-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010802159822
Love, M. C. (2006). The debt that can never be paid: A report card on the collateral consequences of conviction.Criminal Justice, 21, 16-25.
Love, M., & Chin, G. (2010). The 'major upheaval' of Padilla v. Kentucky: Extending the right to counsel to the collateral consequences of conviction. American Bar Association Criminal Justice, 25, 36-42.
Manning, R. (2011). Punishing the innocent: Children of incarcerated and detained parents. Criminal Justice Ethics, 30, 267-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2011.628830
Maruna, S., & Roy, K. (2007). Amputation or reconstruction? Notes on the concept of''knifing off'' and desistance from crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 104-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986206298951
Mauer, M. (2004). Felon disenfranchisement: A policy whose time has passed. Human Rights: Journal of the Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, 31, 16-19.
Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateralconsequences of mass imprisonment. New York, NY: New Press.
McKnight, D. K. (2005).Expungement of criminal records: Information brief. St.Paul: Minnesota House of Representatives, Research Department.
McNeill, F., Batchelor, S., Burnett, R., & Knox, J. (2005). 21st century social work, reducing reoffending: Key practice skills. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Executive, St. Andrew's House.
Miller, K. (2010). The impact of parental incarceration on children: An emerging need for effective interventions. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23, 472-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-006-0065-6
Moffat, C. T. (2011). Helping Those in Need: Human Service Workers.Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 55 (3), 22-32. Available: DOI: http://www.bls.gov/opub/ooq/2011/fall/art03.pdf
Mule, B., & Yavinksy, M. (2006). Saving one's home: Collateral consequences of innocent family members.New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 30, 689-699.
Mustaine, E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27, 329-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620600605606
National Association of Social Workers. (2001). NASW standards for cultural competence in social work practice. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
Olivares, K., Burton, V., Jr., & Cullen, F. T. (1996). The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A national study of state legal codes 10 years later. Federal Probation, 60, 10-17.
Olivares, K., Burton, V., Jr., & Krause, G. (1997). Reducing the legal consequences of a felony conviction: A national survey of state statutes ten years later. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 1, 141-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1997.9678591
Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record.American Journal of Sociology, 108,937-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/374403
Pager, D. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644851.001.0001
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Phillips, S., Leathers, S., & Erkanli, A. (2009). Children of probationers in the child welfare system and their families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18,183-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-008-9218-x
Pinard, M. (2005). Logistical and ethical difficulties of informing juveniles about the collateral consequences of adjudications. Nevada Law Journal, 6, 1111-1126.
Pinard, M. (2010a). Collateral consequences of criminal convictions: Confronting issues of race and dignity. New York University Law Review, 85, 457-534.
Pinard, M. (2010b). Reflections and perspectives on reentry and collateral consequences. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100, 1213-1224.
Pogorselski, W., Wolff, N., Pan, K., & Blitz, C. (2005). Behavioral health problems, ex-offender reentry policies, and the Second Chance Act.American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1718-1724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.065805
Radice, J. (2012). Administering Justice: Removing Statutory Barriers to Reentry. University of Colorado Law Review, 83, 715.
Raynor, P., & Robinson, G. (2009). Rehabilitation, crime, and justice (rev. and updated ed.). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Roberts, A., & Brownell, P. (1999). A century of forensic social work: Bridging the past to the present. Social Work, 44, 359-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/44.4.359
Rothstein, M. (2006). Reaching through the prison walls: Social work in an appellate defender office. The Champion, 30, 3802.
Sahl, J. (2013). Battling collateral consequences: The long road to redemption. Criminal Law Bulletin, 49 (3), 1-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2008463
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points throughout life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128793039003010
Schneider, M. (2010). From criminal confinement to social confinement: Helping ex-offenders obtain public housing with a certificate of rehabilitation. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 36, 335.
Segall, J. (2010). Mass incarceration, ex-felon discrimination and black labor market disadvantage. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 13, 159.
Silva, L. (2010). Clean slate: Expanding expungements and pardons for non-violent federal offenders. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 79, 155-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2773773
Steinberg, R. (2006). Beyond lawyering: How holistic representation makes for good policy, better lawyers, and more satisfied clients. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 30, 625-635.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. (2007). Collateral consequences and community re-entry for registered sex offenders with child victims: Are the challenges even greater? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46, 113-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802071550
Thompson, H. (2011, January). Why mass incarceration matters to social workers: The importance of reckoning with the history of, and wrestling with the present-day impact of the carceral state on the ground and in the trenches. Presented at Removing the Bars: A Skills-Based Conference on Criminal Justice, Columbia University School of Social Work, New York.
Travis, J., Robinson, L., & Soloman, A. (2002). Prisoner reentry: Issues for practice and policy. Criminal Justice, 17 (1), 12-18.
Truman, A. (2003). Unexpected evictions: Why drug offenders should be warned others could lose public housing if they plead guilty. Iowa Law Review, 89, 1753-1773.
Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2002). Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review, 67, 777-803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3088970
Uggen, C., Manza, J., & Thompson, M. (2006). Citizenship, democracy, and the civic reintegration of criminal offenders. The Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 281-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206286898
Umbreit, M. (1989). Crime victims seeking fairness, not revenge: Toward restorative justice. Federal Probation, 53, 52-57.
van Wormer, K. (1999). The strengths perspective: A paradigm for correctional counseling. Federal Probation, 63 (1), 51-58.
van Wormer, K., & Boes, M. (1998, June). Social work, corrections, and the strengths approach. Paper presented at the Canadian Association of Social Workers,National Social Work Conference meeting, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Wheelock, D. (2005). Collateral consequences and racial inequality: Felon status restrictions as a system of disadvantage. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 82-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986204271702
Wildeman, C. (2010). Parental imprisonment, the prison boom, and the concentration of childhood disadvantage. Demography, 46, 265-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0052
Young, D., & LoMonaco, S. (2001). Incorporating content on offenders and corrections in social work curricula. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 475-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2001.10779069