Disproportionate Minority Contact in the American Juvenile Justice System: Where are We after 20 Years, a Philosophy Shift, and Three Amendments?
Main Article Content
Abstract
For the past 20 years, youth of color have been over represented in the American juvenile justice system. Over that same period, the philosophy of the juvenile court has changed from a more informal and rehabilitative model to a more formal and punitive model, and minority youth have experienced disparate and more severe outcomes than their majority counterparts. Starting in 1988, 3 significant policy changes were made via amendments to the JuvenileJustice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 mandating that states address disproportionate minority contact (DMC). The author examined the philosophy shifts in juvenile justice, as well as systemic and DMC policy changes, and their effects on the current status ofminority over representation. Recommendations are presented for social workers to address disproportionate minority contact.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Bennett, W. J., DiIulio, J. J., & Walters, J. P. (1996).Body count: Moral poverty...and how to win America's war against crime and drugs. New York: Simon & Shuster.
Bishop, D. M., Leiber, M., & Johnson, J. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority over representation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 213-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204009361177
Bridges, G. S., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657267
Bynum, T., Wordes, M., & Corley, C. (1993). Disproportionate representation in juvenile justice in Michigan. Technical report prepared for the Michigan Committee on Juvenile Justice, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Disproportionate Minority Contact Technical Assistance Manual (3rd ed.). (2006, August). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Dunn, C., Cernkovich, S., Perry, R., & Wicks, J. (1993). Race & juvenile justice in Ohio: The overrepresentation and disproportionate minority confinement of African American & Hispanic youth. Columbus, OH: Governor's Office of Criminal Justice.
Faust, F. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1974). Juvenile justice philosophy: Readings, cases and comments. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice: Annual Report 2006.(2006, December). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Feld, B. C. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Griffin, P., Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). Trying juveniles as adults in criminal court: An analysis of state transfer provisions. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
Hsia, H., Bridges, G. S., & McHale, R. (2004). Disproportionate minority confinement: 2002 update. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e306442005-001
Kempf-Leonard, K. (2007). Minority youths and juvenile justice: Disproportionate minority contact after nearly 20 years of reform efforts.Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5 (1), 71-87.Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006295159
Leiber, M. J. (2002). Disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) of youth: An analysis of state and federal efforts to address the issue. Crime & Delinquency, 48 (1), 3-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001112870204800101
McCarter, S. A. (2009). Legal and extralegal factors affecting minority over representation in Virginia's juvenile justice system: A mixed method study. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 26, 533-544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-009-0185-x
Mennel, R. M. (1972). Origins of the juvenile court: Changing perspectives on the legal rights of juvenile delinquents.Crime and Delinquency, 1, 68-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001112877201800111
Platt, A. M. (1969). Child savers: The invention of delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pope, C. E., Lovell, R., & Hsia, H. M. (2002). Disproportionate minority confinement: A review of the research literature from 1989 through 2001. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Roscoe, M., & Morton, R. (1994). Disproportionate Minority Confinement Fact Sheet #11. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, State Relations and Assistance Division.
Sickmund, M., Synder, H. N., & Poe-Yamagata, E. (1997). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1997 update on violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Waite, E. E. (1921). How far can court procedure be socialized without impairing individual rights? Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 12, 339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1134279
Yablonsky, L., & Haskell, M. R. (1988). Juvenile delinquency (4th ed.). New York:Harper & Row Publishers.