False Security: North Carolina Sexual Offenders’ Perceptions of Residence Restrictions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite increasingly restrictive sexual offender legislation from 1994 until 2006, there is little evidence that these laws are reduc-ing the number and severity of sexually motivated crimes. This study used a nonrandom sample of 231 adult sexual offenders from 11 outpatient treatment sites and assessed their experiences with residence restrictions in the state of North Carolina. Results indicate sexual offenders face emotional and financial difficulties as a result of residence restrictions, even in a state where restric-tions are less stringent. Young adults, in particular, had difficulty securing housing and were often unable to live with supportive family members. Overall, sexual offenders believed residence restrictions do nothing to prevent recidivism.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Agudo, S. E. (2008). Irregular passion: The unconstitutionality and inefficacy of sex offender residency laws. Northwestern University Law Review, 102, 307-341.
Bagley, A. L. (2008). An era of human zoning: Banishing sex offenders from com-munities through residence and work restrictions. Emory Law Journal, 75, 1347-1392.
Beck, V., Clingermayer, J., Ramsey, R., & Travis, L. (2004). Community response to sex offenders. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 32,141-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009318530403200202
Bonnar-Kidd, K. K. (2010). Sexual offender laws and prevention of sexual violence or recidivism. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 412-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.153254
Colorado Department of Public Safety. (2004). Report on safety issues raised by living arrangements for and location of sex offenders in the community. Denver, CO: Sex Offender Management Board.
Georgia sexual offender residency requirement ruled unconstitutional. (2008). Contemporary Sexuality, 42 (1), 8.
Datz, A. L. (2009). Sex offender residency restrictions and other sex offender manage-ment strategies: The probation officer perspective in Florida. Retrieved from http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/getdoc/bce869a7-6027-4166-bc80-1766e78a1765/Datz-Amy-Research-paper-pdf.aspx
Gwyn, M. (2007). Recidivism study. Retrieved from http://www.tbi.state.tn.us/tn_crime_stats/publications
Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,13, 105-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320101300204
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services.
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
Huenke, C., O'Connell, J., Price, S., & Weidlein-Crist, P. (2007). Recidivism of Delaware adult sex offenders released from prison in 2001. Retrieved from www.sac.omb.delaware.gov
Hughes, L. A., & Burchfield, K. B. (2008). Sex offender residence restrictions in Chicago: An environmental injustice? Justice Quarterly, 25, 647-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802119976
Levenson, J. S. (2008). Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Studies, 21 (2), 153-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010802159822
Levenson, J. S. (2009). Restricting sex offender residence policy implications. Human Rights: Journal of the Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, 36 (2), 21-23.
Levenson, J. S. (2012). Sex offender residency restrictions impede safety goals. Retrieved at http://jurist.org/hotline/2012/02/jill-levenson-sexoffenders-residency.php
Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 7, 137-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restric-tions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X04271304
Levenson, J. S., D'Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Megan's Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 587-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.770
Levenson, J. S., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community reentry. Justice Research and Policy, 9 (1), 59-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.9.1.2007.59
Levenson, J. S., Zgoba, K., & Tewksbury, R. (2007). Sex offender residence restric-tions: Sensible crime policy or flawed logic? Federal Probation, 71 (3), 2-9.
Lobanov-Rostovsky, C., &McBride-Brown, S. (2009, October). So you want (or already have) a management board-now what? Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Dallas, TX.
Mandelstam, J., & Mulford, C. (2008). Unintended consequences of sex offender residency laws: Can GIS mapping help? Corrections Today, 70, 104-105.
Marques, J., Nelson, C., West, M. A., & Day, D. M. (1994). The relationship between treatment goals and recidivism among child molesters. Behaviour, Research and Therapy, 32, 577-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)90148-1
Meloy, M., Miller, S., & Curtis, K. (2008). Making sense out of nonsense: The decon-struction of state-level sex offender residence restrictions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 209-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-008-9042-2
Mercado, C. C., Alvarez, S., & Levenson, J. (2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 188-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208317540
Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2007). Residential Proximity & Sex Offense Recidivism in Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: Author.
Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Residential location and mobility of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 177-192. North Carolina Sex Offender and Public Protection Registration Programs (N.C.G.S §14-208.5-208.45) (n.d.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885890
Ohio Public Safety. (2007). Report to the Ohio criminal sentencing commission: Sex offenders. Retrieved from www.ocjs.ohio.gov
Payne, B. K., Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2010). Attitudes about rehabilitating sex offenders: Demographic, victimization, and community-level influences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 580-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.029
Sample, L. L., & Bray, T. M. (2006). Are sex offenders different? An examination of rearrest patterns. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 83-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403405282916
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. B. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 309-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170500524246
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. B. (2007). Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 380-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128706286915
Tofte, S. (2007). No easy answers: Sex offender laws in the United States. Human Rights Watch Retrieved from http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2007/09/11/no-easy-answers
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). Sex offender residency restrictions: How mapping can inform policy. In Short: Toward Criminal Justice Solutions. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/222759.pdf
Valentine, D., & Huebner, B. (2006). Sex offender recidivism in Missouri and com-munity corrections options. Retrieved from www.mosac.mo.gov
Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission. (2001). Assessing risk among sex offend-ers in Virginia. Retrieved from http://www.vcsc.state.va.us/sex off_report.pdf
Walker, J. (2007). Eliminate residency restrictions for sex offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 863-870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00479.x
White, K. (2008). Where will they go? Sex offender residency restrictions as modern-day banishment. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 59, 161-189.
White-Carns, T., McKelvie, S., & Cohn, L. (2007). Criminal recidivism in Alaska. Retrieved from www.ajc.state.ak.us
Zandbergen, P. A., & Hart, T. C. (2006). Reducing housing options for convicted sex Offenders: investigating the impact of residency restriction laws using GIS. Justice and Research Policy, 8, 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.8.2.2006.1
Zandbergen, P. A., & Hart, T. C. (2009). Geocoding accuracy considerations in deter-mining residency restrictions for sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 62-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403408323690
Zevitz, R. (2004). Sex offender placement and neighborhood social integration: The making of a scarlet letter community. Criminal Justice Studies, 17, 203-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0888431042000235039
Zevitz, R., Crim, D., & Farkas, M. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 375-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0798(200003/06)18:2/3<375::AID-BSL380>3.0.CO;2-N
Zgoba, K., Veysey, B., & Dalessandro, M. (2010). An analysis of the effectiveness of community notification and registration: Do the best intentions predict the best practices? Justice Quarterly, 27, 667-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903357673