Forensic Social Work Practice Standards: Definition and Specification
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social work practice is coming under increased scrutiny due to increased statutory regulation of practice and promotion of evidence-based practice (EBP). The social work profession has gen-erated minimal, generic practice standards that are not well-suitedto modern, specialized practice in social work. Forensic social work is a specialty that is vulnerable to misapplication of generic, minimal practice standards to highly complex clinical situations forensic practitioners face in routine practice. This article defines the various levels of performance expectations (standard of care, practice standards, professional ethics, generally accepted practice,practice guidelines, practice protocols, and best practices) in rankorder based on the degree of mandated performance. Issues facedin developing concise and precise performance expectations areexplored. The articles concludes with a preliminary generic model of forensic social work practice standards.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (1997). Practice guidelines: Psychosocial evaluations of suspected sexual abuse in children (2nd ed.). Chicago: Author.
American Psychological Association. (2009). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. Washington, DC: Author.
Barker, R. L., & Branson, D. M. (2000). Forensic social work: Legal aspects of professional practice. New York: Haworth.
Berliner, L., & Conte, J. (1993). Sexual abuse evaluations: Conceptual and empirical obstacles. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 111-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(93)90012-T
Bourg, W., Broderick, R., Flagor, R., Kelly, R., Ervin, D., & Butler, J. (1999). A child interviewer's guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brownell, P., & Roberts, A. L. (2002). A century of social work in criminal justice and correctional settings. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35 (2), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v35n02_01
Carnes, C., Wilson, C., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (1999). Extended forensic evaluation when sexual abuse is suspected: A model and preliminary data. Child Maltreatment, 4, 242-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559599004003005
Carnes, C. N., Nelson-Gardell, D., Wilson, C., & Orgassa, U. C. (2001). Extended forensic evaluation when sexual abuse is suspected: A multisite field study. Child Maltreatment, 6, 230-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559501006003004
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1994). How reliable are children's statements...It depends. Family Relations, 43, 255-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/585411
Chatfield, G. (2008). History of the NOFSW. Unpublished manuscript.
Clermont, K. M. (2010). Federal rules of civil procedure. New York: Foundation Press.
Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect of the Ohio Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics the Ohio Department of Health and The Ohio Attorney General's Office. (2000). Ohio Pediatric Sexual Abuse Protocol. Cincinnati, OH:Author.
Connell, M. (2008). The child advocacy center model. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), The evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment and testimony (pp. 423-450) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Conte, J. R. (1995). Assessment of children who may have been abused: The real world context. In T. Ney (Ed.),True and false allegations of child sexual abuse (pp. 290-301). New York: Brunner Mazel.
Dahir, V. B., Richardson, J. T., Ginsburg, G. P., Gatowski, S. I., Dobbin, S. A., &Merlino, M. L. (2005). Judicial application of Daubert to psychological syndrome and profile evidence: A research note. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11,62-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.62
Daly, L. W. (2000). A simplified interview protocol in interviewing alleged child abuse victims, Kent, WA: Daly Corporation.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
DeVoe, E. R., & Faller, K. C. (2002). Questioning strategies in interviews with children who may have been sexually abused. Child Welfare, 81, 6-31.
Elliot, D. M., & Briere, J. (1994). Forensic sexual abuse evaluations of older children: Disclosures and symptomatology. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 261-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370120306
Faller, K. C. (2006). Interviewing children about sexual abuse: Controversies and best practices. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311778.001.0001
Frothingham, T. (1994). The British case conference in child sexual abuse: Another model for America. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 103-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(94)90100-7
Frye v. United States. 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
Gardner, R. A. (2005).Protocols for the sex abuse evaluation. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
Gatowski, S. I., Dobbin, S. A., Richardson, J. T., Ginsburg, G. P., Merlino, M. L., & Dahir, V. B. (2001). Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges onjudging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 433-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012899030937
General Electric Company v. Joiner. (96-188) 78 F.3rd 524 (1997).
Gonzalez, L. S., Waterman, J., Kelly, R., McCord, J., & Oliveri, M. K. (1993). Children's patterns of disclosures and recantations of sexual and ritualistic abuse allegations in psychotherapy. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 281-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(93)90047-9
Green, G., Thorpe, J., & Traupmann, M. (2005). The sprawling thicket: Knowledge and specialisation in forensic social work. Australian Social Work, 58, 142-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0748.2005.00199.x
Haynes-Seman, C., & Baumgarten, B. (1994). Children speak for themselves: Using the Kempe interactional assessment to evaluate allegations of parent-child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20, 1139-1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(96)00106-8
Helibrun, K., DeMatteo, D., Marczyk, G., & Goldstein, A. M. (2008). Standards of practice and care in forensic mental health assessment: Legal, professional, and principals-based considerations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14,1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.14.1.1
Hewitt, S. K. (1999). Assessing allegations of sexual abuse in preschool children: Understanding small voices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hinkle, J. L., Fowler, S., McLlvoy, L., & Bell, S. (2005). What are neuroscience nursingbest practices? (Guest Editorial). Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 37, 236-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01376517-200510000-00001
Hughes, D. S., & O'Neal, B. A. (1983). A survey of current forensic social work. Social Work, 8, 392-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/28.5.393
Jaffee v. Redmond. (95-266), 518 U.S. 1 (1996).
Keary, K., & Fitzpatrick, C. (1994). Children's disclosure of sexual abuse during formal investigation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18, 543-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(94)90080-9
Krafka, C., Dunn, M. A., Johnson, M. T., Cecil, J. S., & Miletich, D. (2002). Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony infederal civil trials. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 8, 309-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.8.3.309
Kumho Tire Co v. Carmichael. (97-1709) 526 U.S. 137 (1999) 131 F.3d 1433.
Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 1201-1231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1998). Conducting investigate interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims. Child Abuse and Neglect, 2, 813-823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00056-8
Lewis, K. (2009).Child custody evaluations by social workers: Understanding the five stages of custody. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Lyon, T. D., Lamb, M. E., & Meyers, J. E. B. (2009). Authors' responses to Vieth: Legal and psychological support for the NICHD interviewing protocol.Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 71-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.02.002
Maschi, T., Bradley, C., & Ward, K. (2009). Forensic social work: Psychosocial and legal issues in diverse practice settings. New York: Springer.
Merriam-Webster (2010). Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2010) Springfield, MA.
Munson, C. E. (2002a). Forensic social work and expert testimony in child welfare. In G. Greene & A. R. Roberts, (Eds.), Social workers' desk reference (pp. 684-690). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Munson, C. E. (2002b). The techniques and process of supervisory practice. InG. Greene, & A. R. Roberts (Eds.), Social workers desk reference (pp. 38-44). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Munson, C. E. (2002c). Handbook of clinical social work supervision (3rd ed.). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
Munson, C. E. (2007). Contemporary issues and trends in social work supervision. In W. Spitzer (Ed.), Trends in social work health care practice and supervision (pp. 1-28). New York: Thomas Publishers.
Munson, C. E. (2009). Forensic social work and expert witness testimony in child welfare. In A. R. Roberts & D. Springer (Eds.), Social work in juvenile and criminal justice settings: An evidence-based handbook (pp. 67-92). Springfield, IL: Charles V. Thomas.
Myers, J. E. B., et al. (2002). The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment(2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. R., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 85-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335557743000053
National Association of Social Workers. (1996). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center. (2004). Child physical and sexual abuse: Guidelines for treatment: Revised report. Charleston, SC: Author.
National Organization of Forensic Social Work. (1997). What is forensic social work? Retrieved on April 25, 2010, from http://www.nofsw.org
Neighbors, I. A., Chambers, A., Levin, E., Nordman, G., & Tutrone, C. (2000). Social work and the law: Proceedings of the National Organization of Forensic Social Work. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Oss, M. E. (2005). What are ''best practices,'' anyway? (Editorial), Behavioral Health Management, 18,3.
Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (2003). Investigative interviews of children: A guide fo rhelping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Reamer, F. (2006a). Social work values and ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Reamer, F. (2006b). Ethical standards in social work: A review of the NASW code of ethics. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Rice, S. A. (1929). Interviewer bias as a contagion. American Journal of Sociology, 35, 421-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/215055
Roberts, A. R., & Brownell, P. (1999). A century of forensic social work: Bridging the past to the present. Social Work, 44, 359-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/44.4.359
Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1996). Narrative elaboration: Test of a new procedure for interviewing children. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. 1996, 64, 1347-1357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1347
Sorenson, T., & Snow, B. (1991). How children tell: The process of disclosure in child sexual abuse. Child Welfare, 70 (1), 2-3.
Sperling, H. D. (1999). Expert evidence: The problem of bias and other things. Retrieved from http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/sc=se.nsf=pages=sp-030999
Steller, M., & Ko ̈hnken, G. (1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp.217-245). New York: Springer.
Vaughan v. Menlove(1837). 3 Bing. N.C. 467, 132 E.R. 490 (C.P.).
Vieth, V. (2008). The development of forensic interview training models: A reply toLamb, Orbach, Hershkowitz, Esplin, and Horowitz.Child Abuse and Neglect, 32, 1003-1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.01.004
Virginia Board of Social Work (2010). Regulations governing the practice of Social Work. 18 VAC 140-20-10 et seq. Richmond, VA: Virginia Board of Social Work Examiners.
Wakefield, H. (2006). Guidelines on investigatory interviewing of children: What is the consensus in the scientific community.American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24, 57-74.
Walters, S., Holmes, L., Bauer, G., & Vieth, V. (2003). Finding words: Half a nation by 2010. Interviewing children and preparing for court. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse.
Wrightsman, L. S. (2001). Forensic psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Yuille, J. C. (Ed.) (1989). Credibility assessment. London: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7856-1