Inter-Professional Collaboration: Perceptions and Practices with Youth with Complex Problems

Main Article Content

SUSAN MCCARTER
Tina Maschi
Keith Morgan

Abstract

Youth with complex problems are frequently served by multiple public systems, including mental health, child welfare, juvenile justice, and education. Effective inter-professional collaboration is necessary to meet the needs of these youth, yet relationships among individual characteristics of service providers and their collaborative activities have not been examined. This study explores inter-professional beliefs, perceived competencies, and practices of licensed social workers serving youth with complex problems, using data from the National Association of Social Workers Workforce Study. Our analyses suggest that perceived importance of collaboration may contribute to and predict collaborative activities (B = 1.05, SE = .13, β= .30, p <.001) and this relationship remained positive and significant after controlling for gender, race/ethnicity, years of practice experience, and sector of employment. Better understanding of these inter-professional beliefs, competencies, and practices may help identify training, workforce development, and supervision needs for forensic social work with this vulnerable population.

Article Details

How to Cite
SUSAN MCCARTER, Tina Maschi, & Keith Morgan. (2014). Inter-Professional Collaboration: Perceptions and Practices with Youth with Complex Problems. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 4(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2013.859027
Section
Articles

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

Bandler, B. (1973). Interprofessional collaboration in training in mental health. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 43 (1), 97-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1973.tb00789.x

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman Publishing.

Center for Health Workforce Studies, School of Public Health, University at Albany. (2006). Licensed social workers in the United States, 2004. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from http://workforce.social-workers.org/studies/fullStudy0806.pdf

Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, Georgetown University. (2008). Bridging two worlds: Youth involved in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems: A policy guide for improving outcomes. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.napcwa.org/home/docs/BridgingWorldsPolGuide.pdf

Council on Social Work Education. (2008). 2008 Educational policy and accredita-tion standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=13780

D'Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., Rodriguez, L. S. M., & Beaulieu, M.-D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1, 116-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500082529

Fabelo, T., Thompson, M. D., Plotkin, M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks, M. P., & Booth, E. A. (2011). Breaking schools' rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students' success and juvenile justice involvement. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center. Retrieved from http://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Breaking_Schools_Rules_Report_Final.pdf

Forbes, J., & Watson, C. (2011). The transformation of children's services: Examining and debating the complexities of inter/professional working. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge, Taylor, & Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818411

Guile, D. (2012). Inter-professional working and learning: "Recontextualising" les-sons from "project work" for programmes of initial professional formation. Journal of Education and Work, 25 (1), 79-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644908

Herz, D. C., & Ryan, J. P. (2008). Building multisystem approaches in child welfare and juvenile justice. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, Georgetown University. Retrieved from http://cjjr.georgetown.edu/pdfs/pre_work/BuildingMultisystemApproachesinChildWelfareandJuvenileJustice.pdf

Holden, G., Anastas, J., Meenaghan, T., & Metrey, G. (2002). Outcomes of social work education: The case for social work self efficacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(1), 115-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2002.10779086

Holden, G., Meenaghan, T., & Anastas, J. (2003). Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives: Evidence for the use of self-efficacy as an outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 425-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2003.10779147

Joint Commission on Mental Health of Children. (1969). Crisis in child mental health: Challenge for the 1970's. Report of the Joint Commission on Mental Health of Children. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Kearney, K., Bloom-Ellis, B., & Thompson, R. (2012). Breaking down the silos: Lessons learned from the expansion of performance-based contracting to resi-dential treatment services in Illinois. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 6, 83-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2012.644220

McCarter, S. A., Haber, M. G., & Kazemi, D. (2010). Models to guide system reform for at-risk youth. Child and Youth Care Forum, 39, 465-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9113-7

National Association of Social Workers. (2006). Assuring the sufficiency of a frontline workforce: A national study of licensed social workers. Washington, DC: Author.

Perlin, M. L. (2012). "Justice's beautiful face": Bob Sadoff and the redemptive promise of therapeutic jurisprudence. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 40, 265-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531204000210

Petro, J. (2006). Increasing collaboration and coordination of the child welfare and juvenile justice systems to better serve dual jurisdiction youth: A literature review. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America, Research and Evaluation Division. Retrieved from http://www.cwla.org/programs/juvenile-justice/jjlitreview.pdf

Rausch, M. (2006, Fall). Discipline, disability, and race: Disproportionality in Indiana schools. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~equity/docs/discipline_disability_race_indiana.pdf

Ryan, J. P., Testa, M. F., & Zhai, F. (2008). African American youth in foster care and the risk of delinquency: The value of social bonds and permanence. Child Welfare, 87, 115-140.

Smith, B., & Mogro-Wilson, C. (2007). Multi-level influences on the practice of inter-agency collaboration in child welfare and substance abuse treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 545−556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.06.002

Wagner, M. (1995). Outcomes for youths with serious emotional disturbance in secondary school and early adulthood. The Future of Children, 5 (2), 90-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1602359

Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & Guzmán, A.(2003). NLTS2 data brief: Who are secondary students in special education today. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Retrieved from www.ncset.org/publications/viewdesc.asp?id=1008.

Way, D., Jones, L., & Busing, N. (2000, May). Implementation strategies: Collaboration in primary care-family doctors & nurse practitioners delivering shared care. Toronto, Canada: Ontario College of Family Physicians.

Wexler, D. (2008). Two decades of therapeutic jurisprudence. Touro Law Review, 24, 1-13.