Is There a Place for Extended Assessments For Evaluating Concerns About Child Sexual Abuse? Perceptions of 1,294 Child Maltreatment Professionals
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article reports the findings from an online survey of child maltreatment professionals about the appropriateness of extended assessments when maltreatment concerns cannot be resolved in a single interview. Respondents practiced in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and 3 territories, and reported mean years of experi-ence about 15 years. The overwhelming majority of respondents saw the need for extended assessments and endorsed a wide range of child and context characteristics appropriate for extended assess-ments, the most common being cases where children denied abuse despite persuasive evidence to the contrary, cases with multiple types of maltreatment, cases with preschool age children, and cases with children with disabilities. On average about a fourth of the children seen in their work would benefit from an extended assessment. More than one fourth of respondents actually conducted extended assessments. Respondents however identified barriers and drawbacks to extended assessments, including lack of funding, lack of training, and concerns about contaminating the child’s account.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Bourg, W., Broderick, R., Flagor, R., Kelly, D., Ervin, D., & Butler, J. (1999). A child interviewer's guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Carnes, C., & LeDuc, D. (1998). Forensic evaluation of children. Huntsville, AL: National Children's Advocacy Center.
Carnes, C., Wilson, C., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (1999). Extended forensic evaluation when child abuse is suspected: A model and preliminary data. Child Maltreatment, 4, 242-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559599004003005
Carnes, C., Wilson, C., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2000). Addressing the challenges and controversies in child sexual abuse interviewing: The forensic evaluation proto-col and research project. In K. C. Faller (Ed.), Maltreatment in early childhood: Tools for research-based intervention (pp. 83-104). New York, NY: Haworth Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315786476-8
Carnes, C., Wilson, C., & Nelson-Gardell, D., & Orgassa, U. (2001). Extended forensic evaluation when sexual abuse is suspected: A multi-site study. Child Maltreatment, 6, 230-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559501006003004
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. (1974). Pub. L. No. 93-247U.S.C. TITLE 42 Chapter 67 SECTION 5101-5107.
Ceci, S., Huffman, M., Smith, E., & Loftus, E. (1994). Repeatedly thinking about a non-event: Source misattributions among preschoolers. Consciousness & Cognition, 3, 388-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1994.1022
Connell, M. (2009). The extended forensic evaluation. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), The evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment and testimony (pp. 451-487). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Cross, T. P., Jones, L., Walsh, W., Simone, M., Kolko, D., Szczepanski, J., ... Magnuson, S. (2008). Evaluating children's advocacy centers' response to child sexual abuse. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV136.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e515162009-001
Davies, D., Cole, J., Albertella, G., McCulloch, L., Allen, K., & Kekevian, L. (1996). A model for conducting forensic interviews with child victims of abuse. Child Maltreatment, 1, 189-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559596001003002
Everson, M., & Sandoval, J. (2011). Forensic child sexual abuse evaluations: Assessing subjectivity and bias in professional judgments. Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal, 35, 287-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.001
Faller, K. C. (2007). Interviewing children about sexual abuse: Controversies and best practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311778.001.0001
Faller, K. C., Cordisco-Steele, L., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2010). Allegations of sexual abuse of a child: What to do when a single forensic interview isn't enough. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment, & Program Innovations for Victims, Survivors, & Offenders, 19, 572-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2010.511985
Faller, K. C., Grabarek, M., Nelson-Gardell, D., & Williams, J. (2011). Techniques employed by forensic interviewers conducting extended assessments: Results from a multi-site study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 20 (3), 237-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.557031
Faller, K. C., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2010). Extended evaluations in cases of child sexual abuse: How many sessions are sufficient? Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment, & Program Innovations for Victims, Survivors, & Offenders, 19, 648-668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2010.522494
Goodman, G. S., & Quas, J. A. (2008). Repeated interviews and children's memory: It's more than just how many. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 386-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00611.x
Herman, S. (2009). Forensic child sexual abuse evaluations: Accuracy, ethics, and admissibility. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), The evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment (pp. 247-266). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Lamb, M. (2005). Trends in children's disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1203-1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.04.008
Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M., Sternberg, K., Pipe, M., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 753-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.10.016
Hershkowitz, I., & Terner, A. (2007). The effects of repeated interviewing on children's forensic statements of sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 1131-1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1319
La Rooy, D., Katz, C., Malloy, L., & Lamb, M. (2010). Do we need to rethink guidance on repeated interviews? Psychology, Public Policy, & the Law, 16, 373-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019909
La Rooy, D., Lamb, M., & Pipe, M. E. (2009). Repeated Interviewing: A critical evaluation of the risks and potential benefits. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Research, evaluation, and testimony for the courts (pp. 327-364). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Lamb, M., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201-1231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
Lawson, L., & Chaffin, M. (1992). False negatives in sexual abuse disclosure interviews. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 532-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088626092007004008
Leander, L. (2010). Police interviews with child sexual abuse victims: Patterns of reporting, avoidance and denial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 192-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.011
London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S., & Shuman, D. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about how children tell? Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 11, 194-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.194
Lyon, T. D. (2007). False denials: Overcoming methodological biases in abuse disclosure research. In M. E. Pipe, M. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. Cederborg (Eds.), Disclosing abuse: Delays, denials, retractions, and incomplete accounts (pp. 41-62). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
National Children's Advocacy Center. (2011). Training on extended forensic interviewing. Retrieved from http://www.nationalcac.org/ncac-training/efi-training.html
Orbach, Y., Lamb, M., La Rooy, D., & Pipe, M. E. (2011). A case study of witness consistency and memory recovery across multiple investigative interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 118-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1803
Orbach Y., Shiloach, H., & Lamb, M. (2007). Reluctant disclosers of child sexual abuse. In M. E. Pipe, M. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. Cederborg (Eds.), Disclosing abuse: Delays, denials, retractions, and incomplete accounts (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Patterson, T., & Pipe, M. E. (2009). Exploratory assessments of child abuse: Children's responses to interviewer's questions across multiple interview sessions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 490-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.12.012
Tishelman, A., Meyer, S., Haney, P., & McLeod, S. (2010). The clinical-forensic dichotomy in sexual abuse evaluations: Moving toward an integrative model. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19, 590-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2010.512553