The Role of Perceptions in Collaborative Relationships: Implications for Forensic Social Work Practice

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Mar 19, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2012.658750

Main Article Content

Portia L. Cole
Virginia Commonwealth University

Abstract

This study aims to explore the perceptions held by law students who work collaboratively with social work students. Findings from the focus group data indicate that law students’ perceptions of social work may be influenced by stereotypes. Implications for students preparing to enter into forensic social work practice are considered.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cole, P. L. (2012). The Role of Perceptions in Collaborative Relationships: Implications for Forensic Social Work Practice. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 2(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2012.658750
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

References

Abramson, J. S., & Rosenthal, B. S. (1995). Interdisciplinary and interorganizational collaboration. In R. L. Edwards (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed.) (pp. 1479-1489). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

Addams, J. (1910). Twenty years at Hull House. New York, NY: The MacMillan Company.

Anderson, A., Barenberg, L., & Tremblay, P. R. (2007). Professional ethics in interdisciplinary collaboratives: Zeal, paternalism and mandated reporting. Clinical Law Review, 13, 659-718.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.

Barker, R. L. (2003). The social work dictionary (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

Benson, S. R. (2007). Beyond protective orders: Interdisciplinary domestic violence clinics facilitate social change. Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 14, 1-20.

Bronstein, L. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48, 296-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/48.3.297

Colarossi, L., & Forgey, M. A. (2006). Evaluation study of an interdisciplinary social work and law curriculum for domestic violence. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 307-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2006.200400497

Cole, P. L. (2010). The Richmond Family Law Clinic Social Work Operations Manual. Richmond, VA: VCU School of Social Work.

Cole, P. L. (in press). You want me to do what? Ethical practice within interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics.

Coleman, B. (2001). Lawyers who are also social workers: How to effectively combine two different disciplines to better serve clients. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 7, 131-158.

Council on Social Work Education. (1998). Working paper on interprofessional education principles. Alexandria, VA: Author.

Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dickens, J. (2006). Care, control and change in child care proceedings: Dilemmas for social workers, managers and lawyers. Child and Family Social Work, 11, 23-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00386.x

Faller, K. C., & Vandervort, F. E. (2007). Interdisciplinary clinical teaching of child welfare practice to law and social work students: When world views collide. The University of Michigan Journal of Law and Reform, 41, 121-165.

Galowitz, P. (1999). Collaboration between lawyers and social workers: Re-examining the nature and potential of the relationship. Fordham Law Review, 67, 2123-2154.

Hartley, C. C., & Petrucci, C. J. (2004). Practicing culturally competent jurisprudence: A collaboration between social work and law. Journal of Law & Policy, 14, 133-181.

Hyer, K., Fairchild, S., Abraham, I., Mezey, M., & Fulmer, T. (2000). Measuring attitudes related to interdisciplinary training: revisiting the Heinemann, Schmitt and Farrell attitudes toward health care teams scale. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 14, 249-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713678570

Johnson, P., & Cahn, K. (1995). Improving child welfare practice through improvements in attorney-social worker relationships. Child Welfare, 74, 383-394.

Kirst-Ashman, K. K., & Hull, G. H. (2009). Generalist practice with organizations and communities (4th ed.). Florence, KY: Brooks=Cole Cengage Learning.

Kools, S., McCarthy, M., Durham, R., & Robrecht, L. (1996). Dimensional analysis: Broadening the conception of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 312-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600302

Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Kruse, K. R. (2004). Justice, ethics, and interdisciplinary teaching and practice: Lawyers should be lawyers, but what does that mean?: A response to Aiken & Wizner and Smith. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 14, 49-84.

Linhorst, D. M. (2002). A review of the use and potential of focus groups in social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 1, 208-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001002620

Madden, R. G. (2000). Legal content in social work education: Preparing students for interprofessional practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20(1=2), 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v20n01_02

Madden, R. G., & Wayne, R. H. (2003). Social work and the law: A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. Social Work, 48, 338-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/48.3.338

Maschi, T., & Killian, M. L. (2011). The evolution of forensic social work in the United States: Implications for 21st century practice. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1(1), 8-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541198

Maschi, T., & Killian, M. L. (2009). Defining collaborative forensic social work with diverse populations. In T. Maschi, C. Bradley, & K. Ward (Eds.), Forensic social work: Psychosocial and legal issues across diverse practice settings (pp. 3-9). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

Pierce, C. T., Gleason-Wynn, P., & Miller, M. G. (2001). Social work and law. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 34(3), 61-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v34n03_09

Reber, A. S., Allen, R., & Reber, E. (2009). Penguin dictionary of psychology (4th ed.). New York, NY: Penguin Books.

Schatzman, L. (1991). Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process (pp. 303-314). New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

Sellers, S. L., Ward, E. C., & Pate, D. (2006). Dimensions of depression: A qualitative study of wellbeing among Black African American immigrant women. Qualitative Social Work, 5(1), 45-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325006061538

St. Joan, J. (2001). Building bridges, building walls: Collaboration between lawyers and workers in domestic violence clinic and issues of client confidentiality. Clinical Law Review, 7, 403-467.

Taylor, S. (2006). Educating future practitioners of social work and law: Exploring the origins of inter-professional misunderstanding. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 638-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.06.006

Thyer, B. A., & Wodarski, J. S. (1990). Note on social work education Social learning theory: Toward a comprehensive conceptual framework for social work education. Social Service Review, 64(1), 144-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/603746

Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (Eds.). (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.