Social Worker Assessments of Competency to Stand Trial

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 4, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2015.1109398

Main Article Content

Ronald Roesch

Abstract

This article focuses on an expanding role for social workers conducting assessments of competency to stand trial. This pretrial assessment is the most common form of pretrial forensic evaluations. Although a handful of states explicitly allow social workers to conduct these evaluations, it is suggested that this is a role in which social workers could have a greater role as the field of forensic social work develops. It is suggested that this role can be enhanced through the development of forensic specialty guidelines. The article reviews competency laws and assessment procedures and provides an overview of forensic assessment instruments that can be used in the evaluation of competency to stand trial. The special circumstances surrounding evaluations of competency in juvenile court are also examined.

Article Details

How to Cite
Roesch, R. (2016). Social Worker Assessments of Competency to Stand Trial. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 5(1-3), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2015.1109398
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1-3 (2015)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

References

American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. American Psychologist, 68, 7-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029889

Bonnie, R. J. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 291-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370100303

Butters, R. P., & Vaughan-Eden, V. (2011a). Letter from the editors. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541196

Butters, R. P., & Vaughan-Eden, V. (2011b). The ethics of practicing forensic social work. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 61-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541202

Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). Immaturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 741-760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.416

Cox, M. L., & Zapf, P. A. (2004). An investigation of discrepancies between mental health professionals and the courts in decisions about competency. Law and Psychology Review, 28, 109-132.

Drope v. Missouri. (1975) 420 U. S. 162.

Dusky v. United States. (1960) 362 U.S. 402.

Feld, B. C. (2000). Juveniles' waiver of legal rights: Confessions, Miranda, and the right to counsel. In T. Grisso, & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 105-138). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Fitzgerald, J. F., Peszke, M. A., & Goodwin, R. C. (1978). Competency evaluations in Connecticut. Psychiatric Services, 29, 450-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.29.7.450

Frost, L. E., de Camara, R. L., & Earl, T. R. (2006). Training, certification and regulation of forensic evaluators. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6, 77-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J158v06n02_06

Godinez v. Moran. (1993) 113 S. Ct. 2680.

Goldstein, A., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2010). Evaluating capacity to waive Miranda rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195366174.001.0001

Grisso, T. (2005). Evaluating juveniles' adjudicative competence: A guide for clinical practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

Grisso, T., & Quinlan, J. (2005). Juvenile court clinical services: A national description. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 56, 9-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2005.tb00175.x

Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York, NY:Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

Heilbrun, K., Grisso, T., Goldstein, A. M., & LaDuke, C. (2013). Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. In R. Roesch, & P. A. Zapf (Eds.), Forensic assessments in criminal and civil law: A handbook for lawyers (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199766857.003.0001

In re Gault. (1967) 387 U.S. 1.

Indiana v. Edwards. (2008) 554 U.S. 164.

Jenkins v. United States. (1962) 113 U.S. App. D.C. 300, 307.2d 637.

Kent v. United States. (1966) 383 U.S. 541.

Kruh, I., & Grisso, T. (2009). Evaluations of juveniles' competence to stand trial. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195323078.001.0001

Maschi, T., & Killian, M. L. (2011). The evolution of forensic social work in the United States: Implications for 21st century practice. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 8-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541198

McGaha, A., Otto, R. K., McClaren, M. D., & Petrila, J. (2001). Juveniles adjudicated incompetent to proceed: A descriptive study of Florida's competence restoration program. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 427-437.

McLachlan, K., Roesch, R., & Douglas, K. S. (2011). Examining the role of interrogative suggestibility in Miranda rights comprehension in adolescents. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 165-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9198-4

Melton, G., Weithorn, L., & Slobogin, C. (1985). Community mental health centers and the courts: An evaluation of community-based forensic services. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Miranda v. Arizona. (1966) 384 U.S. 436.

Munson, C. (2011). Forensic social work practice standards: Definition and specification. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 37-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541200

Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Zapf, P. A., Warren, J. I., & Henderson, C. E. (2008). Clinician variation in findings of competence to stand trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 177-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013578

Otto, R., Poythress, N., Edens, N., Nicholson, R., Monahan, J., Bonnie, R., ...Eisenberg, M. (1998). Psychometric properties of the MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication. Psychological Assessment, 10, 435-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.4.435

Pate v. Robinson. (1966) 383 U. S. 375.

Petrella, R. C., & Poythress, N. G. (1983). The quality of forensic evaluations: An interdisciplinary study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 76-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.1.76

Poythress, N. G., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., Otto, R. K., & Hoge, S. K. (2002). Adjudicative competence: The MacArthur studies. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8493-7

Poythress, N. G., Nicholson, R. A., Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., & Hoge, S. K. (1999). The MacArthur competence assessment tool: Criminal adjudication. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Redding, R. E., Goldstein, N. E. S., & Heilbrun, K. (2005). Juvenile delinquency: Past and present. In K. Heilbrun, N. E. S. Goldstein, & R. E. Redding (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency: Prevention, assessment, and intervention (pp. 3-18). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195160079.003.0001

Roberts, A. R. (2008). Social workers' desk reference. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Roesch, R. (2011). Young offenders and legal competencies. In T. Bliesener, A. Beelmann, & M. Stemmler (Eds.), Antisocial behavior and crime: Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention, (pp. 275-290). Cambridge, UK: Hogrefe.

Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1980). Competency to stand trial. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Roesch, R., & Viljoen, J. L. (2016). Assessing adolescents' adjudicative competence. In R. Jackson, & R. Roesch (Eds.), Learning forensic assessment (pp. 271-293). New York, NY: Routledge.

Roesch, R., Zapf, P. A., & Eaves, D. (2006). Fitness Interview Test-Revised: A structured interview for assessing competency to stand trial. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E., & Sewell, K. W. (2004). Evaluation of competency to stand trial-revised professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Siegel, A. M., & Elwork, A. (1990). Treating incompetence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 57-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055789

Siegel, D. M. (2008). The growing admissibility of expert testimony by clinical social workers on competence to stand trial. Social Work, 53, 153-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/53.2.153

Skeem, J., & Golding, S. L. (1998). Community examiners' evaluations of competence to stand trial: Common problems and suggestions for improvement. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 357-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.29.4.357

Surface, D. (2007). State of mind: Evaluating competency to stand trial. Social Work Today, 7(4), 17.

Viljoen, J. L., & Roesch, R. (2005). Competency to waive interrogation rights and adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: Cognitive development, attorney contact, and psychological symptoms. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 723-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-7978-y

Viljoen, J. L., Roesch, R., & Zapf, P. A. (2002). Interrater reliability of the fitness interview test across four professional groups. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 945-952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370204701006

Viljoen, J. L., Roesch, R., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Zapf, P. A. (2003). The role of Canadian psychologists in conducting fitness and criminal responsibility evaluations. Canadian Psychology, 44, 369-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086959

Viljoen, J. L., Vincent, G. M., & Roesch, R. (2006). Assessing adolescent defendants' adjudicative competence: Interrater reliability and factor structure of the fitness interview test-revised. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 449-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806287317

Warren, J. I., DuVal, J., Komarovskaya, I., Chauhan, P., Buffington-Vollum, J., & Ryan, E. (2009). Developing a forensic service delivery system for juveniles adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 245-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14999011003635670

Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2009). Best practices in forensic mental health assessments: Evaluation of competence to stand trial. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195323054.003.0002

Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2011). Future directions in the restoration of competence to stand trial. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 43-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396798

Zapf, P. A., Boccaccini, M. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2003). Assessment of competency for execution: Professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 103-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.491

Zapf, P. A., Roesch, R., & Viljoen, J. L. (2001) Assessing fitness to stand trial: The utility of the fitness interview test (revised edition). Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 426-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370104600508

Zapf, P. A., Skeem, J. L., & Golding, S. L. (2005). Factor structure and validity of the MacArthur competence assessment tool-Criminal adjudication. Psychological Assessment, 17, 433-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.433