Sign Code Development Process: Best Practices

Main Article Content

Dawn Jourdan
Eric Strauss
Madeline Hunter


A wide variety of community stakeholders have an interest in ensuring that sign codes are crafted in such a way as to allow for the free flow of speech while preserving community character.  These stakeholders may include businesses, sign companies, graphic designers, historic preservationists, traffic safety specialists, environmental quality advocates, and chamber of commerce types, among others.  Including interested parties in efforts to develop and revise sign codes can help ensure that the resulting regulation embraces the best available technologies and business practices of the time in an effort to promote the economic vitality of local business districts.  This report seeks to: (a) explore best practices in citizen participation practices revolving around the development or amendment of sign codes; (b) to evaluate the experiences of communities who have revised their sign codes in the last 10 years; and (c) to establish best practices for improving the sign code development process.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Dawn Jourdan, Texas A&M University

Professor, Urban Planning

Eric Strauss, Michigan State University

Professor, Urban Planning

Madeline Hunter, Texas A&M University

Master's Student, Urban Planning


Al-Kodmany, K. (1999) Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, implementation, and evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning. 45 (1), 37-45.

Arnstein, S. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of The American Institute Of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.

Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R. & Burby, R. J. (2003) Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making: Six Strategic Planning Choices. Journal of the American Planning Association. 69 (3). 245-264.

Burby, R. J. (2003) Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action. Journal of the American Planning Association. 69 (1) 33-49.

Camacho, A. E. (2005) Mustering the Missing Voices: A Collaborative Model for Fostering Equality, Community Involvement and Adaptive Planning in Land Use Decisions Installment One. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 24(3), 1-46.

City Club of Portland (Portland, Or.). (1996) City Club of Portland Report: Billboard Regulation in Portland. City Club of Portland

Connolly, B. & Wyckoff, M. (2011). Michigan Sign Guidebook. Petoskey, MI: Scenic Michigan.

Conroy, M. M., & Evans-Crowley, J. (2005) E-participation in planning: an analysis of cities adopting on-line citizen participation tools. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 24. 371-384.

Cupps, D. (1977). Emerging Problems of Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review, 37(5), 478-487.

Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates, (2009). Report of Findings, City of San Jose 2009 Advertising Signs Survey. City Of San Jose, 1-43. Retrieved from

Garvin, E. (2014). Digital Sign Regulations Three things that get overlooked in a sign code update. The Western Planner, July/August, 6-8.

Grabow, S. H., Hiliker, M., & Moskal, J. (2006). Comprehensive Planning and Citizen Participation. University of Wisconsin-Extension/Cooperative Extension.

Jorden, D. A., & Hentrich, M. A. (2003) Public Participation Is on the Rise: A Review of the Changes in the Notice and Hearing Requirements for the Adoption and Amendment of General Plans and Rezonings Nationwide and in Recent Arizona Land Use Legislation. Natural Resources Journal. 43(3), 1-20.

Kelly, E. D., & Raso, G. J. (1989). Sign regulation for small and midsize communities (no. 419). Planning Advisory Service Report.

Lerable, C. A. (1995). Preparing a conventional zoning ordinance (No. 460). American Planning Association, Planning Advisory Service.

Koontz, T. M. (2005) We Finished the Plan, So Now What? Impacts of Collaborative Stakeholder Participation on Land Use Policy. The Policy Studies Journal. 33(5). 459-481.