Analysis of Signage using Eye-Tracking Technology

Main Article Content

Ming Tang

Abstract

Signs, in all their forms and manifestations, provide visual communication for wayfinding, commerce, and public dialogue and expression. Yet, how effectively a sign communicates and ultimately elicits a desired reaction begins with how well it attracts the visual attention of prospective viewers. This is especially the case for complex visual environments, both outside and inside of buildings. This paper presents the results of an exploratory research design to assess the use of eye-tracking (ET) technology to explore how placement and context affect the capture of visual attention. Specifically, this research explores the use of ET hardware and software in real-world contexts to analyze how visual attention is impacted by location and proximity to geometric edges, as well as elements of contrast, intensity against context, and facial features. Researchers also used data visualization and interpretation tools in augmented reality environments to anticipate human responses to alternative placement and design. Results show that ET methods, supported by the screen-based and wearable eye-tracking technologies, can provide results that are consistent with previous research of signage performance using static images in terms of cognitive load and legibility, and ET technologies offer an advanced dynamic tool for the design and placement of signage.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

3M Commercial Graphics Division. (2017). 3M Visual Attention Service Validation Study. St. Paul: 3M Corporation.

Auffrey, C. and Hildebrandt, H. (2017). Do motorists see business signs? Maybe. Maybe not. A study of the probability that motorists view on-premise signs. Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding, 1(2).

Chalup, S., Hong, K. and Ostwald, M. (2010). Simulating pareidolia of faces for architecture image analysis. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 2, 262-278.

Eberhard, J. (2009). Applying neuroscience to architecture. Neuron, 62(6), 753–56.

Garvey, P and Crawford, R. (2014). On-Premise Sign Research Review. Alexandria: National Signage Research Foundation.

Moore, R. (2011). Improving Sign Effectiveness with Visual Attention Modeling Software. St. Paul: 3M Corporation.

Robinson, S. (2015). John Dewey and the dialogue between architecture and neuroscience. Architectural Research Quarterly, 19(4), 361–67.

Sign Research Foundation (SRF). (2019). “Research Best Practices.” https://www.signresearch.org/research-best-practices/

Stebbins, R. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. London: Sage.

Sussman, A. and Hollander, J. (2015). Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How We Respond to the Built Environment. New York: Taylor and Francis.

Sussman, J., Ward, J. and Hollander, J. (2018). “How biometrics can help designers build better places for people.” Common Edge, 05 April. https://commonedge.org/how-biometrics-can-help-designers-build-better-places-for-people/

Tobii. (2019). “Working with Data.” tobiipro. https://www.tobiipro.com/learn-and-support/learn/steps-in-an-eye-tracking-study/data/