Comparing the Effectiveness of Restricted-Operant and Free-Operant Teaching Arrangements on Measures of Acquisition and Fluency Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.1936-9298.2024.1.1.15-35Keywords:
free operant, restricted operant, standard celeration chart, adapted alternating treatments designAbstract
Discrete-trial teaching (DTT), a restricted-operant teaching arrangement, and frequency-building instruction (FBI), a free-operant teaching arrangement, represent two instructional strategies derived from operant conditioning. Researchers and practicing behavior analysts have used both to establish and firm up novel stimulus-behavior relations. Despite the effectiveness of both procedures, few studies have compared the two techniques and assessed the effects on the emergence of fluent responding. The current study extends the research to typically developing college students to directly compare DTT and FBI. We taught participants the numerals 0-10 in unknown foreign languages (i.e., Mandarin, Arabic, and Hindi) using both procedures. Under both conditions, we held constant the number of practice trials and frequency of reinforcement. Results found quicker acquisition under restricted-operant conditions for all participants, though none of the participants met the desired frequency aim prior to the end of the study. We discuss the results of the study in the context of planning for learning across three stages of learning.
References
Aravamudhan, S., & Awasthi, S. (2021). The use of prompts and precision teaching to address speech sound disor-ders in a 17-year-old girl with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(3), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00470-7
Binder, C. (1993). Behavioral fluency: A new paradigm. Educational Technology, 33(10), 8–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428106
Bulla, A. J. (2023) Towards an Understanding of the Continuum of Operant Freedom: Some Recent Basic and Conceptual Work [conference presentation]. The 36th Annual Conference of the Standard Celeration Society, St. Petersburg, Florida.
Cariveau, T., & Fetzner, D. (2022). Experimental control in the adapted alternating treatments design: A review of procedures and outcomes. Behavioral Interventions, 37(3), 805-818. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1865
Cariveau, T., Irwin Helvey, C., Moseley, T. K., & Hester, J. (2022). Equating and assigning targets in the adapted al-ternating treatments design: Review of special education journals, Remedial and Special Education, 43(1). 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932521996071
Doughty, S. S., Chase, P. N., & O’Shields, E. M. (2004). Effects of rate building on fluent performance: A review and commentary. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392086
Evans, A. L., Bulla, A. J., & Kieta, A. R. (2021). The precision teaching system: a synthesized definition, concept analy-sis, and process. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(3), 559 –576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00502-2
Fabrizio. M.A, & Moors, A.L., (2003) Evaluating mastery: Measuring instructional outcomes for children with au-tism. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 4(1 –2), 23 –36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2003.11434213
Ghezzi, P.M. (2007). Discrete trials teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 44(7), 667 –679. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20256
Gist, C. & Bulla, A. J. (2022). A systematic review of frequency building and precision teaching with school-aged children. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31, 43 –68. https://dio.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09404-3
Johnson, K., & Street, E. M. (2012). From the laboratory to the field and back again: Morningside Academy's 32 years of improving students' academic performance. The Behavior Analyst Today, 13(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100715
Johnson, K., Street, E.M., Kieta, A.R., Robbins, J.K., (2020). The Morningside model of generative instruction. Building a bridge between skills and inquiry teaching. Sloan Publishing.
Knutson, J. (1970). Aggression during the fixed-ratio and extinction components of a multiple schedule of rein-forcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13 221 –231. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1970.13-221
Kubina, R. M. (2019). The precision teaching implementation manual. Greatness Achieved.
Lindsley, O. R. (1996). The four free-operant freedoms. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393164
Marsh, G., & Johnson, R. (1968). Discrimination reversal learning without “errors.” Psychonomic Science, 10, 261–262. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03331510
McTiernan, A., Holloway, J., Healy, O., Hogan, M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of the Morningside math facts curriculum on fluency, stability, endurance and application outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25(1), 49 –68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9227-y
Nopprapun, M., & Holloway, J., (2014). A comparison of fluency training and discrete trail instruction to teach letter sounds to children with ASD: Acquisition and learning outcomes. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 788 –802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.03.015
Pennypacker, H.S., Gutierrez Jr., A., & Lindsley, O.R. (2003). Handbook of the standard celeration chart. Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.
Pierce, W. D. & Cheney, C. D. (2017). Behavior analysis and learning: A biobehavioral
approach (6th ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203441817
Ratkos, T., Frieder, J.E. & Poling, A. (2016) Accurate delayed matching-to-sample responding without rehearsal: An un- intentional demonstration with children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0052-8
Richling, S. M., Williams, W. L., & Carr, J. E. (2019). The effects of different mastery criteria on the skill maintenance of children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(3), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.580
Stocker, J.D., Schwartz, R., Kubina, R.M., Kostewicz, D., & Kozloff, M. (2019). Behavioral fluency and mathematics in-tervention research: A review of the last 20 years. Behavioral Interventions, 34(1), 102 –117. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1649
Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Comparison designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case re-search methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 297–345). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203521892-12
Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Comparative designs. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds.), Single case re-search methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666-11
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrew Bulla, Jennifer L. Wertalik, Leah Yakabovits
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
